Validity of the urine dipslide under daily practice conditions.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 12876111.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: So far, the validity of urine dipslides has been studied only under optimal conditions, which may not reflect the situation in daily practice. OBJECTIVE: We studied the validity of the urine dipslide as performed under daily practice conditions and assessed the influence of the incubation period (24 h versus 48 h) on validity. METHODS: Fresh urine samples of patients with signs/symptoms of a possible urinary tract infection (UTI) were examined in general practice via a nitrite test, a urine sediment and a dipslide. A second dipslide was inoculated and sent to the hospital microbiology laboratory for culture. This culture acted as gold standard. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the tests performed. RESULTS: Of the 273 patient episodes included, 62% had a UTI (166 of 268 cultures). The sensitivity of the dipslide performed in daily general practice was 73% and the specificity was 94%. CONCLUSION: The validity of the dipslide read under practice conditions is lower than under optimal conditions. Actions to improve performance are needed. Nonetheless, using the dipslide instead of the sediment as a second step after the nitrite test would improve the diagnostic work-up of UTI.