Surgical connections from ventricle to pulmonary artery. Comparison of four types of valved implants.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1423993.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Four types of valved conduits used to correct venous ventricle to pulmonary artery (V-PA) discontinuity were compared. Four hundred fifty-seven patients with congenital heart defects requiring a V-PA connection during the past 25 years were reviewed. Age at implant varied from 1 day to 64 years (mean, 9.1 years). Four types of valved prostheses were used: 1) homograft conduit (HC, n = 178), 2) valved Dacron conduit (VDC, n = 126), 3) polystan conduit (PC, n = 47), and 4) orthotopic pulmonary valve implant (PVI, n = 106). There were 83 early deaths (18.2%) and 34 late deaths (8.5%). Follow-up ranged from 1 month to 22 years (mean, 3.5 years). One hundred eight conduit replacements were performed in 93 patients (21%). The overall patient survival was 73 +/- 2.3%, 67 +/- 3.2%, and 56 +/- 6.8% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Factors predictive of patient survival were diagnosis (p < 0.001) and valve size (p < 0.001). Age at operation (p < 0.001) and type of valve (p < 0.001) were the only risk factors for valve survival. At 5 years, survival of PVI (89 +/- 5%) and VDC (89 +/- 4%) was significantly better than survival of HC (46 +/- 13%) or PC (57 +/- 9%). Patients who survived the initial construction of a V-PA conduit had a reasonable long-term survival. A PVI was the most durable prosthesis. A Dacron porcine-valved conduit had significantly better durability than either a cryopreserved homograft or a PC.
Medical subject headings
- Bioprosthesis
- Heart Defects, Congenital
- Heart Valve Prosthesis
- Pulmonary Artery