Technical variability of the RT3 accelerometer.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 14523319.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the technical performance of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer. Twenty-three RT3 accelerometers were subjected to a specific vibration along each sensitive axis in isolation, using a motorized vibration table that produced frequencies of 2.1, 5.1, and 10.2 Hz, respectively. Data were analyzed for frequency and axis effects and inter- and intra-instrument variability. ANOVA showed a frequency by axis interaction (F2.1,36.8 = 19.9, P < 0.001). Post hoc tests revealed the Y axis count to be significantly higher than the X and Z axes counts at 5.1 and 10.2 Hz. There was no difference in counts between axes at 2.1 Hz. Interinstrument coefficients of variation (CV) decreased as frequency increased (21.9 to 26.7% at 2.1 Hz, 6.3 to 9.0% at 5.1 Hz, and 4.2 to 7.2% at 10.2 Hz). The intraclass correlation (ICC) between RT3s was 0.99, regardless of the axis. Intra-instrument CV also decreased as frequency increased (2.1 to 56.2%, 0.3 to 2.5%, and 0.2 to 2.9% at 2.1, 5.1, and 10.2 Hz, respectively. There were no differences in counts recorded on the X, Y, and Z axes at 2.1 Hz; however, the counts recorded along the Y axis were significantly higher than the counts at the X and Z axes at 5.1 and 10.2 Hz. Due to large coefficients of variation for both inter- and intra-instrument variability at 2.1 Hz, testing the inter- and intra-instrument variability of the accelerometers before use is recommended.
Medical subject headings
- Monitoring, Physiologic