Unicondylar arthroplasty of the knee--cheap at half the price?

Abstract

Between June 1999 and October 2002 we performed 355 total knee replacements (75 bilateral cases) and 135 medial unicondylar arthroplasties (27 bilateral cases). The cases were not randomised with the result that those undergoing total knee replacement had more severe disease though not enough to account for the differences observed. The total knees were in hospital 4 days longer than the unicondylar knees (8.2 days compared with 4.1 days). Bilateral cases stayed on average 1 day longer than unilateral cases. Unicondylar knees did not require blood transfusion and none were given outpatient physiotherapy. The average saving for a unilateral unicondylar knee compared with a total knee was pound 1435 in the NHS sector and pound 2386 (30%) in the private sector. For bilateral cases the savings were pound 2287 and pound 3615 (29%), respectively. The biggest saving was between bilateral unicondylar knees and two unilateral total knees being pound 3480 in the NHS and pound 6578 (42%) in the private sector. Such differences almost certainly apply to different systems of delivering healthcare in other countries.