Bayesian two-compartment and classic single-compartment minimal models: comparison on insulin modified IVGTT and effect of experiment reduction.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 14656059.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Models describing plasma glucose and insulin concentration of an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) allow a noninvasive cost-effective approach to estimate important indexes characterizing the efficiency of glucose-insulin control system, i.e., glucose effectiveness (S(G)) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)). To overcome some limitations of the classic single compartment minimal model (1CMM) of glucose kinetics , a two-compartment Bayesian minimal model (2CBMM) has been recently proposed for the standard IVGTT. This study aims to assess 2CBMM ability to describe the insulin-modified IVGTT (IM-IVGTT) which is the protocol of choice since it allows to study insulinopenic states. Both a full-length IM-IVGTT (240 min) as well as a reduced version (90 min) of it are studied. Results of the maximum a posteriori identification of IM-IVGTT (240 min) in 13 normals agree with those of standard IVGTT, i.e., a 42% decrease (P < 0.002) of S(G) and a 13% increase (P < 0.006) of S(I) with respect to ICMM. When identified from IM-IVGTT (90 min), 2CBMM not only provides S(G) and S(I) estimates 46% lower (P < 0.002) and 41% higher (P < 0.002) than 1CMM ones respectively, but also seems to overcome some limitations of the 240 min-based identification that probably arise because the minimal model is unable to properly account for the hyperglycemic hormonal response taking place in the second half of IM-IVGTT.
Medical subject headings
- Blood Glucose
- Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
- Glucose Tolerance Test
- Insulin
- Insulin Resistance
- Models, Biological