Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) and surgical revascularisation in renovascular disease--a retrospective comparison of results, complications, and mortality.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 14718896.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate results, complications and mortality following percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) and open surgical revascularisation for renovascular disease. A retrospective evaluation of 381 renovascular patients (median age 64, range 9-99 years, 152 women) treated at Malmö University Hospital during 1987-1996. Two hundred and sixty-two (69%) of the patients were treated with PTRA, 106 (28%) with open revascularisation. Thirty-day mortality was 2% in the PTRA group and 9% after open surgery (p<0.001). There were no differences between groups concerning the number of re-do procedures, but first re-do was performed after seven (IQR 3-14) months in the PTRA group, and after 15 (IQR 10-44) months after open revascularisation (p<0.0001). After a median follow-up of 4 months (IQR 0-13) systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) had decreased (p<0.0001) in both groups. The number of antihypertensive drugs was reduced (p<0.0001) and S-creatinine levels were unchanged in both groups. Long-time survival assessed with log-rank analysis was better (p<0.01) in the PTRA group. The risk ratio for death with open revascularisation was 1.69 (p<0.01). In this retrospective comparison, PTRA was as effective as open revascularisation, with lower complication rate and lower early and long-time mortality, but with shorter time to first re-do.
Medical subject headings
- Angioplasty, Balloon
- Renal Artery Obstruction