Cost-effectiveness of immediate specimen adequacy assessment of thyroid fine-needle aspirations.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 14750242.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Pathologists and cytotechnologists often provide immediate specimen adequacy evaluation of thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) to ensure that diagnostic material is obtained. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of this practice. All patients who had a thyroid FNA specimen accessioned at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, during a 6-month period were included and divided into 2 groups: (1) with or (2) without immediate adequacy assessment. Specimen adequacy from each group was compared. The time spent to perform the adequacy assessment was recorded. Compared with group 2, group 1 had more specimens with diagnostic cellular material (67.2% vs 47.0%) and fewer specimens with suboptimal (23.3% vs 38.1%) or nondiagnostic cellular material (9.5% vs 14.9%) (P = .002). At the time of adequacy assessment, 98% (60/61) of the adequate specimens were obtained with 3 or fewer passes. The improved rate of diagnostic material was achieved at a cost of 220 minutes of cytologists' time per additional diagnostic specimen compared with group 2. It may be most cost-effective to routinely obtain 3 passes and to perform immediate adequacy assessment under special circumstances such as repeated procedures.
Medical subject headings
- Biopsy, Fine-Needle
- Specimen Handling
- Thyroid Diseases
- Thyroid Gland