Laboratory staff qualifications and accuracy of proficiency test results. A national study.

Abstract

In the last quarter of 1988, laboratories from across the country that participated in the College of American Pathologists (Northbrook, Ill) proficiency testing program were asked to complete a questionnaire describing their staffing pattern and submit it with their test results. Laboratories were then divided into two groups, those employing 100% American Society of Clinical Pathologists (Chicago, Ill) certified technologists and those employing 0% American Society of Clinical Pathologists certified technologists. The nonparametric Wilcoxon significance test was used to determine differences in accuracy of test results for laboratories in each group. Significant differences were found for the basic laboratory survey, comprehensive diagnostic immunology, comprehensive blood banking, comprehensive hematology, and comprehensive chemistry. chi 2 Analysis revealed that laboratories employing 100% American Society of Clinical Pathologists certified technologists had a significantly higher probability of achieving 80% accuracy across all surveys. These results present a strong argument that staffing with qualified technologists contributes to maximizing the quality of laboratory services offered to the public.