A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15067636.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a technique to accurately assess cementless femoral stem-bone contact. Using this technique, differences in contact patterns between tapered (Synergy) and cylindrical distal fixation (Prodigy) cementless stems were explored. Femurs were prepared and the 2 types of femoral stems were implanted. After implantation, the femurs were imaged in a spiral computed tomography scanner and analyzed using novel custom-developed imaging software. This analysis used a geometric deformable-model UNIX-based software that determined bone-prosthesis contact area. The tapered stem features proximal, cancellous bone contact and a 3-point fixation pattern. The cylindrical distal fixation stem demonstrates cortical support in the distal aspect of the stem.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Bone Cements
- Femur
Anatomy
- femur
- hip