CSF drainage in patients with posterior fossa tumours.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1514423.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The management of hydrocephalus secondary to a posterior fossa tumour is controversial. We audited recent practice with a retrospective analysis of 287 consecutive patients undergoing posterior fossa exploration for tumour. 85 shunts and 112 external ventricular drains (EVD) were placed. The overall CNS infection rate in the series was 6%. There was a significantly higher (p less than 0.01) infection rate in patients who had a drainage procedure, and a trend towards higher infection rates in patients with two drainage procedures. Early infection rates with EVDs and shunts were the same (7%). One third of patients with hydrocephalus had pre-operative drainage, a third had per-operative drainage but only a quarter required a permanent shunt. The majority of patients will not require a permanent shunt and where temporary CSF diversion is required EVD is reasonable.
Medical subject headings
- Brain Neoplasms
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts
- Hydrocephalus
- Postoperative Complications