Comparison of cemented ceramic and metal-polyethylene coupling hip prostheses in ankylosing spondylitis.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1516332.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Two groups of patients suffering from ankylosing spondylitis were treated by total hip arthroplasty. Twenty-one patients (37 hips) were treated with cemented metal-polyethylene prosthesis, whereas 18 patients (36 hips) had cemented ceramic coupling implants. The two groups had similar preoperative clinical data. The average follow-up period was seven to eight years for both. Each patient was graded clinically (pain, function, range of motion, deformities) and roentgenographically (radiolucent lines, etc.). Patients with metal-polyethylene implants showed important modifications of the bone around the implant. Clinical and roentgenographic results were relatively good in patients with ceramic implants. The results underline the importance of the friction coupling of the implant.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Cements
- Ceramics
- Hip Prosthesis
- Polyethylenes
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
Anatomy
- hip