Effects of job insecurity from a workplace closure threat on fatigue and psychological distress.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15167392.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the effect of potential workplace closure, an externally attributed form of job insecurity, on fatigue and psychological distress. In April 1999, the minister responsible announced that a governmental agency would close down one of its two locations. Baseline data from the employees were available before the closure announcement (n = 574) because they were enrolled in the Maastricht Cohort Study on "Fatigue at Work." In the closure group, the relative risk for becoming a psychological distress case was 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-2.05) during 13 months after the closure threat. Within the closure group, a difference in relative risk for psychological distress was observed between employees who self reported an increase in job insecurity (relative risk = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.41-2.42) and employees who did not report an increase in job insecurity (relative risk 1.14; 95% CI = 0.58-2.24)
Medical subject headings
- Fatigue
- Occupational Health
- Stress, Psychological
- Unemployment