Treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a 2- versus 3-step approach.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15167857.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether colposcopically directed biopsy is a necessary step in the evaluation of patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. A retrospective analysis was conducted of the correlation between the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolaou test and the colposcopically directed biopsy and the correlation between the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolaou test and the loop electrosurgical excisional procedure. Of 72 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on Papanicolaou test, 48 patients had a pathologic diagnosis on cervical biopsy of CIN II or greater, which provides a 67% correlation between the Papanicolaou test and the colposcopically directed biopsy. Fifty-six patients had a pathologic diagnosis on loop electrosurgical excisional procedure of CIN II or greater, which provides a 78% correlation between the Papanicolaou test and the loop electrosurgical excisional procedure. The median interval between the Papanicolaou test and the definitive treatment was significantly longer (P <.001) when colposcopically directed biopsy was performed before the loop electrosurgical excisional procedure. The colposcopically directed loop electrosurgical excisional procedure after a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolaou test may reduce the time interval between diagnosis and treatment; furthermore, it offers equal correlation when compared with traditional treatment.
Medical subject headings
- Colposcopy
- Electrosurgery
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia