Are all cementless acetabular components created equal?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15190560.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The cementless acetabular components used over the past 2 decades have varied in type of ingrowth fixation, supplemental fixation, locking mechanisms, and bearing surface. We evaluated 15-year follow-up results from 2 cementless acetabular components: the Harris-Galante I (HG; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) and the PCA (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ), in terms of revision and radiographic loosening. Three of the 120 HG I acetabular components were revised for wear and osteolysis without loosening. Seventeen of the 100 PCA components were revised for aseptic loosening (with or without osteolysis). Including those cases revised, 21 PCA acetabular components were loose radiographically, and no HG I component was loose. At least with these 2 first-generation designs, differences were seen in performance of the acetabular component in terms of revision and loosening at 15 years.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Prosthesis
- Postoperative Complications
- Prosthesis Failure
Anatomy
- hip