Limited thoracotomy as a second choice alternative to transvenous implant for cardiac resynchronisation therapy delivery.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15191778.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Left ventricular (LV) pacing via transvenous implantation has an overall success rate ranging from 88% to 92%. The aim of this study was to assess whether LV pacing via limited thoracotomy would be feasible and safe when used on a routine basis for those cases in which standard transvenous procedures proved to be ineffective or unsatisfactory. We enrolled 33 patients (8 females, 65+/-10 years) who experienced a transvenous implantation failure. All patients underwent a limited thoracotomy and an epicardial lead was implanted. The procedure time was 51+/-28 min. No surgical or post-operative complications occurred and optimal lateral position was achieved for all patients. In the 12 months follow-up period, 5 patients died from refractory heart failure, the remaining patients did not experience complications. At implant, the mean pacing threshold was 1.3+/-0.7 V, bi-ventricular pacing impedance was 476+/-201 Omega and R-wave amplitude was 15.0+/-6.1 mV. No significant differences were found in any of the electrical parameters between baseline and follow-up. Significant improvement was observed in functional and echocardiographic parameters. Our results suggest that a combined approach to cardiac resynchronisation therapy delivery, including a transvenous attempt followed by a back up thoracotomic procedure, could potentially guarantee the success.
Medical subject headings
- Cardiac Output, Low
- Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
- Pacemaker, Artificial
- Thoracotomy