A randomized clinical trial of the intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid volume: amniotic fluid index versus the single deepest pocket technique.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15284736.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether an intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid identifies a pregnancy that is at risk for an adverse outcome. Parturients who were admitted for delivery were assigned randomly to have the amniotic fluid assessed either by amniotic fluid index or by the presence of a 2 x 1 pocket. The amniotic fluid index was obtained in 499 pregnancies, and the 2 x 1 technique was performed in 501. Oligohydramnios was diagnosed in 25% of amniotic fluid index pregnancies versus 8% with the use of the 2 x 1 pocket technique (P <.001). Both techniques failed to identify patients who underwent an amnioinfusion for fetal distress (P=.864) or who experienced variable (P=.208) or late decelerations (P=.210) that influenced delivery, fetal distress in labor (P=.220), caesarean delivery for fetal distress (P=.133), and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (P=.686). Neither the amniotic fluid index nor the 2 x 1 pocket technique that was undertaken as a fetal admission test identifies a pregnancy that is at risk for an adverse outcome.
Medical subject headings
- Amniotic Fluid
- Cesarean Section
- Fetal Distress
- Obstetric Labor Complications
- Oligohydramnios