Severity of heart failure, treatments, and outcomes after fibrinolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15451148.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To define the clinical characteristics, co-morbidities, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients with varying degrees of heart failure (HF) complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and to identify patients at high risk for HF following fibrinolysis. 15,078 STEMI patients enrolled in a worldwide fibrinolytic trial (InTIME-II) were categorised into one of four hierarchical, mutually exclusive groups of HF: shock (n = 719, 5%); severe HF (n = 1082, 7%); mild HF (n = 1619, 11%); no HF (n = 11,658, 77%). In a multivariable model, anterior MI (OR 1.8, 95% CI [1.6; 1.9]), age > or = 65 (OR 1.8 [1.6; 2.0]), prior HF (OR 3.3 [2.6; 4.2]), and creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min (OR 1.8 [1.6; 2.1]) were the four most powerful correlates of HF. Although 30-day mortality was sixfold higher for patients with HF (18.9% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.0001), these patients were less likely to undergo angiography (30% vs. 40%, P < 0.0001) and revascularisation (19% vs. 25%, P , 0.0001), than patients without HF. Likewise, angiotensin-inhibitors and beta-blockers were not optimally utilised in patients with HF following MI. During the index admission following fibrinolysis 23% of patients had HF. Despite a higher risk profile, patients with more severe HF were treated less aggressively than patients without HF.
Medical subject headings
- Cardiac Output, Low
- Myocardial Infarction
- Thrombolytic Therapy