Validity of Futrex-5000 for body composition determination.

Abstract

Underwater weighing (UWW), skinfolds (SKF), and the Futrex-5000 (FTX) were compared by using UWW as the criterion measure of body fat in 30 male and 31 female Caucasians. Estimates of body fat (% fat) were obtained using The Y's Way to Fitness SKF equations and the standard FTX technique with near-infrared interactance (NIR) measured at the biceps, plus six sites for men and five sites for women. SKF correlated significantly higher with UWW than did FTX with UWW for males (0.95 vs 0.80), females (0.88 vs 0.63), and the whole group (0.94 vs 0.81). Fewer subjects (52%) were within +/- 4% of the UWW value using FTX, compared with 87% with SKF. FTX overestimated body fat in lean subjects with less than 8% fat and underestimated it in subjects with greater than 30% fat. Measuring NIR at additional sites did not improve the predicted variance. Partial F-tests indicate that using body mass index, instead of height and weight, in the FTX equation improved body fat prediction for females. Biceps NIR predicted additional variance in body fat beyond height, weight, frame size, and activity level but little variance above that predicted by these four variables plus SKF (2% more in males and less than 1% in females). Thus, SKF give more information and more accurately predict body fat, especially at the extremes of the body fat continuum.