Different F-wave recovery after neuromuscular blockade with pancuronium and mivacurium.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15502038.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1213/01.ANE.0000135407.11545.36.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We performed this study to assess the recovery period after neuromuscular blockade by electromyographic F-wave analysis, a method that supplies more information about more proximal parts of the motor system than conventionally used methods, e.g., mechanomyography (MMG). In 20 neurosurgical ASA physical status I or II patients anesthesia was induced and maintained with IV fentanyl and midazolam. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.25 mg/kg mivacurium (MV group, n = 10) or 0.1 mg/kg pancuronium (PC group, n = 10) intraoperatively. MMG monitoring of the adductor pollicis muscle was performed continuously. F waves were recorded at the abductor pollicis muscle of the contralateral hand at train-of-four (TOF) ratios of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, 0.85, 0.9, and 0.95. Recovery of F-wave amplitudes after neuromuscular blockade with pancuronium was significantly slower compared with mivacurium (P = 0.004) during the clinically important recovery period defined by MMG TOF ratios from 0.7 to 0.95. This electrophysiologic finding suggests a differential recovery of the motor system after administration of pancuronium and mivacurium not detected by MMG.
Medical subject headings
- Isoquinolines
- Neuromuscular Blockade
- Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents
- Pancuronium