Ventricular fibrillation median frequency may not be useful for monitoring during cardiac arrest treated with endothelin-1 or epinephrine.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15562072.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1213/01.ANE.0000138421.74434.E3.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated whether median fibrillation frequency (MF) and mean fibrillation amplitude (AMP) reflect coronary perfusion pressure (CoPP) and predict successful defibrillation. MF, AMP, and CoPP were measured during prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest and resuscitation in pigs. After 5 min of VF, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was started. At 10 min, the pigs received randomly a single dose of endothelin-1 50 mug (n = 7), 100 mug (n = 7), or 200 mug (n = 5), or repeated doses of epinephrine 0.04 mg/kg (n = 6), or saline (n = 6) every 3 min. At 25 min, the pigs were defibrillated to achieve restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). In a nonparametric spectral analysis of the individual MF versus CoPP and AMP versus CoPP curves, we found no link between the different curves in different animals or therapies. No difference was found in MF in pigs with ROSC (n = 8) compared with animals not achieving ROSC (n = 23) immediately before defibrillation (P = 0.85). Our data suggest that, in prolonged VF cardiac arrest, MF and AMP might not be useful tools to reflect myocardial perfusion.
Medical subject headings
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
- Electrocardiography
- Endothelin-1
- Epinephrine
- Heart Arrest
- Ventricular Fibrillation