Alterations in the microbial flora and in the incidence of bacteremia at a university hospital after adoption of amikacin as the sole formulary aminoglycoside.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1576287.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Because of the rapid emergence of resistance to gentamicin and tobramycin among isolates of aerobic and facultative gram-negative bacteria at our university hospital, we designed a prospective study to track aminoglycoside resistance, bacteremic episodes, and bacteremia-associated deaths before and after the institution of amikacin as the sole formulary aminoglycoside. From June 1984 through June 1987 (immediately before this policy change), amikacin accounted for only 20% of patient-days of aminoglycoside therapy, and rates of resistance to gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin among aerobic and facultative gram-negative bacterial isolates were 12.8%, 10.8%, and 5.9%, respectively. During the next 30 months (immediately after the change in policy), amikacin accounted for 98% of patient-days of aminoglycoside therapy, and rates of resistance to gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin were 6.3%, 5.0%, and 3.3%, respectively. Furthermore, during the latter 30 months, the incidence of both bacteremia and bacteremia-associated death decreased significantly. Hospitals at which resistance to gentamicin or tobramycin is increasing among the gram-negative flora may benefit from the use of amikacin as the principal aminoglycoside.
Medical subject headings
- Amikacin
- Bacteremia
- Gram-Negative Bacteria
- Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections