Is prematurity important in ultrasonographic hip typing?

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether prematurity is important with respect to hip typing and planning of treatment/follow-up in newborns assessed with the Graf's ultrasonography method. Between January 1998 and 2003, 1592 neonates; preterm (n=432) and term (n=1160), had their hips ultrasonographically evaluated with Graf typing. There were no statistical differences between the two groups with respect to the numbers of hips that required follow-up assessment, or treatment. The results suggest that prematurity is irrelevant and use of chronological age as opposed to corrected age for prematurity will further simplify diagnosis and planning of follow-up and treatment in the Graf system for neonatal hip assessment.