The effects of hydroxyethyl starch compared with gelofusine on activated endothelium and the systemic inflammatory response following aortic aneurysm repair.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 15963746.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To investigate the effect of HES, used as a plasma volume expander, on endothelial cell activation induced by ischaemia-reperfusion in humans. Forty patients undergoing elective infrarenal aneurysm repair were randomised to receive either gelatine or hydroxyethyl starch solution as plasma expanders. The anaesthetic technique was standardised. All patients received the same crystalloid as per standard protocol. Urine samples and blood samples were collected at various times for assessment of microalbuminuria and von Willebrand factor (vWf) and CRP. The peak C-reactive protein was significantly lower in the patients treated with HES than those treated with gelofusine [142 mg/L (113,196 mg/L) vs 246 mg/L (189,291 mg/L) mg/L, P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney test]. The peak ACR was also significantly lower in the HES treated patients (9.3 mg/mmol vs 23.3 mg/mmol, P < 0.05). The plasma level of vWf was significantly higher in the gelofusine treated patients than those treated with HES [173.5 U/dl Vs 80.5 U/dl, P < 0.001, at 4 hr; 160 U/dl Vs 82.5 U/dl, P < 0.001, at 8 hr; 191 U/dl Vs 100.5 U/dl, P < 0.001, at 12 hr; 209 U/dl Vs 81.0 U/dl, P < 0.001, at 24 hr]. HES may damp down the systemic inflammatory response and reduce endothelial cell dysfunction.
Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
- C-Reactive Protein
- Endothelium, Vascular
- Gelatin
- Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives
- Plasma Substitutes
- Succinates