Automatic ankle pressure measurements using PPG in ankle-brachial pressure index determination.

Jönsson, B; Laurent, C; Eneling, M; Skau, T; Lindberg, L-G · Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg · 2005

case_control · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

To evaluate a new technique using a photoplethysmographic (PPG) probe for automatic ankle pressure measurements. Comparative study on two techniques for ankle pressure measurement. University hospital. Thirty-five patients with leg arterial disease and eight healthy volunteers. Ankle-brachial indices (ABPI) were measured using conventional CW Doppler technique and PPG-based prototype equipment for the ankle pressure recordings. ABPIs calculated from CW Doppler and PPG ankle pressure measurements. The PPG signals were analysed both by visual judgement and by a software based, automatic algorithm. The mean difference between ABPIs calculated from CW Doppler recordings and PPG (visual analysis) was -0.01 (limits of agreement (+/-two standard deviations) +0.16 to -0.19). The correlation coefficient was 0.93. When the algorithm was used, the mean difference (CW Doppler-PPG) was 0.05 (limits of agreement 0.28 to -0.18, r=0.89). The PPG method is a promising technique with an inherent potential for automatisation of the ankle pressure measurements, thereby reducing the observer-dependency in ABPI recordings.

Medical subject headings