Comparative effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane at equihypotensive doses on cardiac performance and coronary and renal blood flows in chronically instrumented dogs.

Abstract

In order to compare equihypotensive effects of the three available volatile anesthetics, halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane, dogs were chronically instrumented for measurement of: arterial, left ventricular, and left atrial blood pressures; rate of rise of left ventricular blood pressure; myocardial wall thickening (pulsed Doppler); cardiac output (pulmonary artery electromagnetic flow meter); and coronary and renal blood flows (pulsed Doppler flow meters). All three anesthetics were administered on different days in random order to each dog (n = 10) at doses necessary to decrease mean arterial pressure to 70 and 45 mmHg and two intermediate arterial blood pressures. Changes in cardiac function and regional blood flows were compared to the awake resting state and between anesthetics using analysis of variance and paired t tests. All three anesthetics produced increases in heart rate and decreases in left ventricular dP/dt, myocardial thickening fraction, and stroke volume with the hypotension. The decreases in cardiac performance were similar among the anesthetics except at the high dose (mean arterial pressure = 45 mmHg). During this profound hypotension, cardiac performance was better maintained during isoflurane anesthesia and most depressed by enflurane anesthesia. Coronary and renal blood flows were well preserved with all three anesthetics even at mean arterial pressures of 45 mmHg. Our results suggest that isoflurane may be more beneficial than halothane or enflurane for producing profound intentional hypotension (less than 50 mmHg mean arterial pressure), although extrapolation from animal experiments to the clinical situation should be used with caution.