Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16086958.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare dynamic contour tonometry as a new method for intraocular pressure measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clinical observational study. The study included 176 eyes of 126 subjects (39 eyes with open-angle glaucoma, 137 normal eyes) and consisted of 528 dynamic contour measurements and 352 Goldmann tonometry measurements. Corneal pachymetry measurements were additionally performed. Mean dynamic contour tonometric measurements (18.71 +/- 5.90 mm Hg) were significantly (P < .001) higher than mean applanation tonometric values (16.98 +/- 5.86 mm Hg), correlating significantly with each other (r(2) = .905, P < .001). The slope of the regression line was 0.95. Correlation with central corneal thickness was significant for applanation tonometry (P = .036), while dynamic contour tonometry was statistically independent of corneal thickness (P = .32). For measurement of intraocular pressure, dynamic contour tonometry may offer a new technology, which, compared with applanation tonometry, may show a lower dependence on central corneal thickness.
Medical subject headings
- Intraocular Pressure
- Tonometry, Ocular