Comparison of virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reformation, and source CT images with contrast material-filled bladder for detecting lesions.

Abstract

The objective of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reformation, and source CT images for lesion detection in the contrast material-filled bladder. Two observers independently evaluated 47 patients (28 men and 19 women; mean age +/- SD, 59 +/- 16 years) with virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reconstruction, and source CT images acquired with contrast material-filled bladder using an MDCT scanner (detector array, 4 x 1.25 mm; beam pitch, 0.75). Agreement between the two observers was evaluated for the three reconstruction methods using kappa statistics. Using the conventional cystoscopic findings as a reference, we compared the results of the three reconstruction techniques both by bladder site and by patient using the McNemar test. The interobserver agreement for the number of positive sites was excellent for virtual cystoscopy (kappa = 0.816), fair for multiplanar reconstruction (kappa = 0.461), and good for source CT images kappa = 0.676). For both observers, the sensitivity for lesion detection by bladder site was significantly greater with virtual cystoscopy (observer 1, 95%; observer 2, 90%) than with multiplanar reconstruction (78% and 60%) and source CT (68% and 65%) images (p < 0.05), whereas the specificity by bladder site and the sensitivity and specificity by patient did not differ with the three methods (p > 0.05). For determining the presence or absence of lesion at each site, virtual cystoscopy was more accurate than multiplanar reconstruction and source CT images for both observers (p < 0.05). Virtual cystoscopy is more accurate than multiplanar reconstruction and source CT images for the detection of lesions in the bladder.