Predictors of success following endovascular aneurysm repair: mid-term results.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16202630.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Australian cases of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed between 1999 and 2001 have been evaluated to determine the mid-term (6 months to 5 years) safety and efficacy of the procedure. This study looks at predictors of success, based on mid-term follow-up data. This study uses results obtained from a prospective semi-voluntary register (audit) of Australian data obtained from surgeons in the private and public sector. Peri-operative mortality for patients enrolled in the audit was 1.8%. Ninety-three percent of procedures were technically successful (890/961). Nearly 13% of patients have had re-interventions (mostly endoluminal) at follow-up. Analysis of audit data shows that the likelihood of experiencing post-operative complications or requiring additional procedures increases with ASA rating, increasing age, large pre-operative aneurysm size, aneurysm angle >45 degrees and number of co-morbid conditions diagnosed. This study confirms satisfactory mid-term results in a, national rather than unit specific, setting. Predictors of clinical failure or need for re-intervention include large aneurysm size, neck angulation >or=45 degrees and short infrarenal neck.
Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis
- Stents