Wavefront-guided ablation: evidence for efficacy compared to traditional ablation.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16458697.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To provide an evidence-based overview of wavefront-guided refractive surgery outcomes, benefits, and limitations. Literature review. Review of FDA study reports and indexed, peer-reviewed literature. More than 400 reports investigating wavefront applications in refractive surgery exist, but studies comparing the outcomes of wavefront-guided treatment with conventional treatment are few in number. Available studies do not overwhelmingly demonstrate superior visual results attributable to a wavefront-guided approach. While wavefront-guided refractive surgery provides excellent results, evidence is limited that it outperforms conventional laser in situ keratomileusis that incorporates broad ablation zones, smoothing to the periphery, eye-trackers, and other technological refinements. However, it is evident that wavefront-customized ablation holds a promising future and merits ongoing investigation.
Medical subject headings
- Cornea
- Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ
- Myopia