A comparison of nasendoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy in assessing velopharyngeal insufficiency.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16500434.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
1) To compare nasendoscopy (NE) and multiview fluoroscopy (MVF) in assessing velopharyngeal gap size; and 2) to determine the relationship between these assessments and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) severity. Retrospective review of consecutive patients with VPI at a tertiary care children's hospital, assessed with NE and MVF between 1996 and 2003. 177 subjects. NE and MVF gap areas were correlated (R = 0.34, 95% CI 0.26-0.41). In adjusted analysis, VPI severity was associated with: 1) NE gap area (OR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.96-3.95), 2) MVF gap area (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.37-1.95), 3) age <5 years (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.47-7.38), and 4) previously repaired cleft palate (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.94). NE and MVF assessments provide complementary information and are correlated. Both are associated with VPI severity. However, the "bird's-eye view" provided by NE has a stronger correlation with VPI severity than MVF. B-2b.
Medical subject headings
- Cineradiography
- Endoscopy
- Fluoroscopy
- Velopharyngeal Insufficiency