Biocompatibility of subsieve-size capsules versus conventional-size microcapsules.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16680700.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Biocompatibility of cell-enclosing capsules, defined as suppression of pericapsular cellular reactions, is one of the factors governing the success of enclosed cell transplantation in in vivo cell therapy. Agarose capsules of subsieve size, less than 100 microm in diameter, and conventional size, approximately 300-1,000 microm in diameter, were implanted into the peritoneal cavity and epididymal fat pads of mice and rats, respectively, to determine the effect of a reduction in diameter to subsieve size. The degree of cellular reaction to the subsieve-size capsules was much lower than that of the conventional-size microcapsules, independent of implantation site. The frequency of overgrown subsieve-size capsules retrieved from the peritoneal cavities was less than 5% in contrast to approximately 20% for capsules 387 microm in diameter. In addition, no increase in floating cells, which are generated through capsule stimulation, was observed in the peritoneal cavity only with subsieve-size capsules. From these results, we concluded that subsieve-size capsules are more biocompatible than microcapsules of conventional size.
Medical subject headings
- Adipose Tissue
- Biocompatible Materials
- Capsules
- Sepharose