A comparison of dual vs. triple antiplatelet therapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: results of the ELISA-2 trial.

Abstract

To compare dual vs. triple antiplatelet pre-treatment in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) who were planned for early catheterization. A total of 328 consecutive patients with NSTE ACS were included and were randomized to pre-treatment with dual (n = 166, aspirin, clopidogrel 600 mg) or triple antiplatelet therapy (n = 162, aspirin, clopidogrel 300 mg, and Tirofiban). The primary endpoint was enzymatic infarct size, defined as cumulative LDH release (LDHQ(48)). Initial TIMI flow of the culprit vessel was a pre-specified secondary endpoint. Angiography was performed in 98% of patients at a median of 23 h after admission. Enzymatic infarct size (median, 25-75%) was 166 (60-349) IU/L in the triple group compared with 193 (75-466) IU/L in the dual group (P = 0.2). Initial TIMI 3 flow of the culprit vessel was significantly more often observed after triple antiplatelet therapy (67 vs. 47%, P = 0.002). At 30 days follow-up, myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 46% of patients in the triple antiplatelet group, compared with 57% in the dual antiplatelet group, P = 0.052. No significant difference in bleeding was present. This study showed that in patients with NSTE ACS, triple antiplatelet pre-treatment was associated with a non-significant reduction in enzymatic infarct size, a significantly better initial perfusion of the culprit vessel, and a trend towards a better survival without death or MI. Further, large-scale studies should be performed to find whether the beneficial trend in favour of triple antiplatelet pre-treatment can be reproduced.