A dosimetric analysis of interstitial intensity modulated implants for pelvic recurrences, base of tongue and orbita tumors with specific references to the ICRU-58.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16730084.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In this article the conversion of the dosimetry of three different kinds of IMBT (intensity modulated brachytherapy) implants into ICRU-58 formalism is presented. The results allow an inter-study comparison of relative reference doses between different sites. The evaluation included 76 patient plans: (a) 31 pelvic recurrences, (b) 30 base of tongue tumors, and (c) 15 orbita tumors were analysed retrospectively and the mean central doses (MCD) and relative reference doses were evaluated. The reference doses D(ref) normalized to the mean central doses of three subgroups resulted in (a) 66%, (b) 68%, and (c) 52%. This is in contrast to the generally proposed standard reference dose of 85% of the Paris system. Reduction of the reference dose yields to higher dose inhomogeneities and affects the positive local tumor control. It was found that in IMBT implants the 85% reference dose of the Paris system is suitable for reporting purposes but not necessarily for dose prescription. Consequently, in IMBT implants the prescription dose of 85% should be critically used.
Medical subject headings
- Brachytherapy
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Orbital Neoplasms
- Pelvic Neoplasms
- Tongue Neoplasms