Patient tolerance of in-office pulsed dye laser treatments to the upper aerodigestive tract.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16730550.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Recent advances in technology have facilitated a movement toward unsedated in-office treatment of laryngeal, tracheal, and esophageal lesions. The objective of this study was to determine patient tolerance of in-office pulsed-dye laser (PDL) treatment of upper aerodigestive tract pathoses via the transnasal esophagoscope. Three hundred twenty-eight unsedated in-office PDL cases were performed at a university-based tertiary referral center in 131 patients. These procedures were performed for various upper aerodigestive pathoses, including recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, chronic granulomas, and recurrent leukoplakia. Eighty-nine subjects completed a phone survey concerning their discomfort level after the PDL procedure. They were also asked specific questions about recovery time, pain medication, and preference of operating room versus in-office procedures. The average comfort score was 7.4 (10 being minimal discomfort). Eighty-four percent did not use any pain medication; 87% stated that, if possible, they would prefer to undergo unsedated in-office procedures rather than surgeries under general anesthesia for further treatment of their upper aerodigestive tract pathosis. Unsedated transnasal treatment of upper aerodigestive tract pathoses is readily accepted and well-tolerated by otolaryngology patients. Patients overwhelmingly prefer the in-office PDL over surgeries under general anesthesia. C-4.
Medical subject headings
- Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
- Esophagoscopy
- Laser Therapy
- Outpatients
- Upper Gastrointestinal Tract