Standing versus supine radiographs in RSA evaluation of femoral head penetration.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16826095.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Evaluation of polyethylene acetabular component wear in total hip arthroplasties commonly is performed using serial radiographs of the hip by measuring the change in the location of the center of the femoral head in relation to the acetabular component. Of the different methods currently used for this purpose, radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is considered the most accurate and precise. In all such radiographic studies, it is assumed the femoral head is seated into the deepest portion of the acetabular component during all radiographic examinations. Although most radiographs used for wear measurements are taken with the patient supine, we questioned whether standing radiographs, with substantial joint load, are better suited for these measurements. We evaluated two groups of patients having total hip arthroplasty who had radiostereometric radiographs taken in supine and standing positions. The average femoral head penetration that occurred between the 6-month and 2-year time interval was measured with radiographs taken in the standing or supine position. We found no difference between the average total femoral head penetration when using supine or standing radiographs.
Medical subject headings
- Arthrography
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Femur Head
- Hip Joint
- Photogrammetry
- Posture
Anatomy
- femur
- hip