Payer type has little effect on operative rate and surgeons' work intensity.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16906062.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Does health-care payer type affect the rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity for patients with orthopaedic conditions? We analyzed the clinical and financial data collected during 6 consecutive years (1999-2004) for a group practice of 40 orthopaedic surgeons. We examined the rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity (total physician's work Resource-based Relative Value System units) by diagnosis, patient age, and payer type. The eight payer types were: capitation health maintenance organization, health maintenance organization, preferred provider organization, indemnity, self-pay, Workers' Compensation, Medicaid, and Medicare. There were 230,306 patients with 526 unique primary diagnoses. Diagnosis accounted for most of the variability in operative rates and surgeons' work intensity. After adjusting for differences attributable to diagnosis, payer type had little effect on the rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity.
Medical subject headings
- Insurance, Health, Reimbursement
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Orthopedics
- Workload