Quantification of emphysema: a composite physiologic index derived from CT estimation of disease extent.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16941093.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The combination of functional indices best reflecting the extent of emphysema is not known. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) studies of 106 patients with emphysema [men=71; median age=61 (range=26-86 years)] were reviewed and the extent of emphysema was quantified: (a) visually (emphysema(vis)) and (b) by automated estimation (emphysema(auto)). Functional-morphologic relationships were compared for the two scoring systems, and a composite physiologic index (CPI) (providing the best fit of functional indices against emphysema extent) was derived. Emphysema(vis) and emphysema(auto) were strongly correlated (r=0.90; p<0.0005), but the extent of emphysema(vis) was consistently greater (p<0.00005). Emphysema(vis) correlated most strongly with indices of gas transfer [percent predicted single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (Dl(co)) and alveolar volume (K(co)); r=-0.70, both p<0.0005]. The combination of physiologic indices most representative of emphysema extent on CT (using visual or automated methods) consisted of K(co) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) levels. The equation explanatory power was higher for visual scoring [emphysema(vis)=96.8-(0.67 x % predicted K(co))-(0.41 x % predicted FEV(1)); equation r(2)=0.57] than automated estimation (equation r(2)=0.48). Weighted combinations of K(co) and FEV(1) levels provide a CPI best reflecting morphologic emphysema extent. CPI has the potential to refine the stratification of patients in epidemiological and therapeutic studies.
Medical subject headings
- Emphysema
- Monitoring, Physiologic
- Severity of Illness Index
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed