Randomize, then consent: a strategy for improving patient acceptance of participation in randomized controlled trials.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 16958184.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
When arthroscopic surgeons are attempting to resolve questions of a therapeutic or clinical nature, randomized controlled trials (Level I evidence) are most helpful. However, patients may be reluctant or unwilling to participate in randomized controlled trials. To improve the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial, a strategy for improving patients' willingness to participate is proposed. The strategy is simple: randomize, then consent. This strategy allows for an informed consent process more specifically focused on the specific treatment to which the patient has been assigned. This may be less confusing, daunting, and frightening to patients, who thus may be more willing to participate in the randomized controlled trial. A disadvantage of randomization before consent is that randomization, temporally, is more distant from the actual treatment or intervention. However, randomization before consent may represent a compromise promoting both better quality consent and increased patient willingness to participate in randomized controlled trials.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroscopy
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic