Immunohistochemical progesterone receptor assay. Measurement by image analysis.

el-Badawy, N; Cohen, C; Derose, P B; Check, I J; Sgoutas, D · Am J Clin Pathol · 1991

case_control · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

To determine the efficiency of image analysis in immunohistochemical progesterone receptor (PgR) measurement, 94 primary breast carcinoma tissue samples were evaluated for PgR by biochemical dextran-coated charcoal assay (DCC) and an immunohistochemical method. Frozen sections immunostained for PgR with a monoclonal antibody (Abbott PgR-ICA, Chicago, IL) and the peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique were scored semiquantitatively histologic score by microscopy and quantitatively (percentage nuclear area immunopositivity [PNA] using the CAS 200 image analyzer (Cell Analysis Systems, Elmhurst, IL). There was a positive correlation between dextran-coated charcoal assay and both histologic score (r = 0.82) and PNA (r = 0.69). Selected cutoff points of 60 histologic score and 6.5% PNA based on sensitivity/specificity calculations yielded a predictive value of a negative test of 73% and 80%, respectively, and a positive predictive value of 100% for both; ranges of fmol/mg protein PgR correspond to ranges of histologic score and PNA. The use of an image analyzer to measure PNA in PgR-immunostained sections is a viable alternative to dextran-coated charcoal assay, especially when insufficient fresh tissue is available.

Medical subject headings