A comparison of intubating conditions in children following induction of anaesthesia with propofol and suxamethonium or propofol and remifentanil.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17223805.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Sixty ASA 1 and 2 children aged between 2 and 16 years who required tracheal intubation as part of anaesthesia for elective surgery were studied. We evaluated intubating conditions, haemodynamic responses and duration of apnoea following propofol 4 mg.kg-1 combined with either remifentanil 1.25 microg.kg-1 (group R), or suxamethonium 1 mg.kg-1 (group S). Tracheal intubation was graded as excellent, good or poor according to ease of laryngoscopy, vocal cord position, coughing, and jaw relaxation and limb movement. Thirty of group S and 28 of group R children were successfully intubated on the first attempt. Overall, intubation conditions were excellent or good in 26/30 (87%) patients in group S and 20/30 (67%) in group R (p<0.05). Mean apnoea time was 190 s in group S, and 362 s in group R (p<0.001). Heart rate increased in response to suxamethonium (p<0.01) and both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in the remifentanil group (p<0.01).
Medical subject headings
- Intubation, Intratracheal
- Piperidines
- Propofol
- Succinylcholine