Using red-free monochromatic conversions of nonmydriatic digital fundus images.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17258543.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare three types of digital images for assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects: red-free RNFL images, color nonmydriatic images, and digitally converted nonmydriatic red-free fundus images. Diagnostic test comparison. Ninety-five image sets of three type images were evaluated. Converted images were acquired from nonmydriatic digital images by converting them into red-free, monochromatic images with graphics software. Taking RNFL images as standards, the sensitivities/specificities of nonmydriatic digital color and converted images were evaluated for detecting wedge-shaped defect (WSD) or diffuse atrophy. In terms of WSD, the sensitivity/specificity of converted images were 85.7%/95.5%, and those of nonmydriatic were 83.9%/91.0%. Regarding diffuse atrophy, the sensitivity/specificity of converted images were 60.0%/97.8%, and those of nonmydriatic were 60.0%/98.9%. Intragrader/intergrader agreements for converted images were 0.849/0.793 (WSD) and 0.417/0.614 (diffuse atrophy). Converted nonmydriatic fundus images without pupillary dilation are as effective as conventional red-free RNFL images for detecting WSD.
Medical subject headings
- Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
- Glaucoma
- Nerve Fibers
- Optic Disk
- Optic Nerve Diseases
- Photography
- Retinal Ganglion Cells