Water sorption and solubility of contemporary resin-based filling materials.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17285606.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Evaluation of water sorption and solubility of contemporary resin-based filling materials. Specimens of Herculite (HE), Point 4 (P4), TetricCeram (TC), Miris (MI), TetricCeram HB (HB), Solitaire 2 (SO), SureFil (SU), Definite (DE), Admira (AD), Dyract AP (DY), Compoglass F (CO), and TetricFlow (TF) were prepared according to ISO 4049. Water sorption and solubility were measured after water storage at 37 degrees C for 7 days. Water sorption was HE 14 microg mm(-3), P4 17 microg mm(-3), TC 12 microg mm(-3), MI 13 microg mm(-3), HB 9 microg mm(-3), SO 18 microg mm(-3), SU 9 microg mm(-3), DE 14 microg mm(-3), AD 27 microg mm(-3), DY 19 microg mm(-3), CO 23 microg mm(-3), and TF 19 microg mm(-3). Solubility was HE 3 microg mm(-3), P4 3 microg mm(-3), TC 1 microg mm(-3), MI 0 microg mm(-3), HB 0 microg mm(-3), SO 3 microg mm(-3), SU 0 microg mm(-3), DE 1 microg mm(-3), AD 2 microg mm(-3), DY 4 microg mm(-3), CO -2 microg mm(-3), and TF 1 microg mm(-3). All materials met the corresponding requirement in ISO 4049. Filler load negatively correlated with water sorption but not with solubility. There was an influence of the resin matrix, too. No significant differences were found between composites, ormocers, and compomers.
Medical subject headings
- Composite Resins
- Dental Materials