Changes in B-readings over time in the United States Navy Asbestos Medical Surveillance Program.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17293759.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To study the impact of variability among B-readers on clinical occupational medicine. A total of 419,770 B-reading reports from February 1980 to May 2004 in the US Navy Asbestos Medical Surveillance Program were analyzed for changes in category from the previous B-reading on each individual worker. Over 7% of films were categorized as worse (ie, read as going from negative to positive), and over 6% were categorized as better. When profusion categories were reported as different from the previous reading (over 6% of the time), they were more frequently read as 2 or more minor categories worse or better. Changes from previous B-readings are common, and may have clinical and other implications, which are discussed. B-readings should not be used as the sole basis for determining the presence or absence of pneumoconiosis.
Medical subject headings
- Asbestosis
- Mass Chest X-Ray
- Occupational Health
- Population Surveillance