Bilateral total hip arthroplasty: one-stage versus two-stage procedures.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17312590.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We compared the outcomes of bilateral total hip arthroplasty performed as a one-stage or two-stage procedure. We retrospectively identified 196 patients (392 hips) with bilateral arthritis of the hip who underwent total hip arthroplasties: 98 patients (196 hips) as a one-stage procedure (one-stage group) and 98 (196 hips) as a two-stage procedure (two-stage group). All patients had uncemented components implanted under spinal anesthesia and had the same postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Both groups' functional outcomes were similar. The mean preoperative hemoglobin was 12.6 g/dL in the one-stage group and 12.9 g/dL in the two-stage group. The mean cumulative blood transfusion was 2.6 units in the one-stage group and 3.5 units in the two-stage group. Patients in the two-stage group had more complications, most commonly anemia and wound drainage. The total mean hospital stay was longer in the two-stage group (8.1 days; range, 5-39 days) compared with the one-stage group (4.3 days; range, 3-11 days). The mean total expenses were higher in the two-stage group (dollar 64,600) compared with the one-stage group (dollar 45,900). Young and healthy patients may be candidates for one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty without an increase in complications and with lower costs.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Prosthesis
Anatomy
- hip