Reported significant observations during anaesthesia: a prospective analysis over an 18-month period.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1739559.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We describe a prospective analysis, in one hospital, of reported significant observations involving unsafe practices and working conditions during anaesthesia. Of the 549 significant observations reported voluntarily during a period of 18 months, 82% involved occurrences which were considered preventable and 27% could have been fatal if they had not been recognized and corrected. Ninety-three percent of incidents did not lead to a negative outcome. Human error was responsible for 411 (75%) reports. Lack of vigilance and failure to check were the most frequently reported factors associated with human error. Significant observations involving errors in drugs administration were the most frequent. Forty-five percent of all reported significant observations were made during maintenance of anaesthesia.
Medical subject headings
- Anesthesia
- Anesthesiology
- Quality of Health Care