Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in elderly and younger patients: results from ExTRACT-TIMI 25.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17456482.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine the effects of age on outcomes in patients with STEMI treated with a strategy of enoxaparin (ENOX) vs. unfractionated heparin (UFH). In the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial, 20,479 patients with STEMI were randomized in a double-blind fashion to UFH or ENOX. A novel reduced dose of ENOX was administered to patients >or=75 years, and a reduced dose in those with an estimated creatinine clearance of < 30 mL/min. Anti-Xa levels were measured in a subset of patients (n = 73). The exposure to anti-Xa over time was lower in the elderly (AUC(0-12 h) P < 0.0001; AUC(steady-state) P = 0.0046). The relative risk reduction (RR) with ENOX on the primary endpoint, i.e. death or non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction, was greater in patients < 75 years (20%) than > 75 years (6%), but the absolute benefits were similar. When compared with UFH, ENOX was associated with an RR of 1.67 for major bleeding, but the magnitude of the excess risk tended to be lower (RR = 1.15) in patients >or= 75 years assigned to ENOX. A dose reduction of ENOX in the elderly appears to be helpful in ameliorating bleeding risk. A strategy of ENOX was superior to UFH in both young and elderly patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolysis.
Medical subject headings
- Heparin
- Myocardial Infarction