Comparison of hip simulator wear of 2 different highly cross-linked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular components using both 32- and 38-mm femoral heads.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17562417.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Much evidence suggests that ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWP) irradiated to 9.5 Mrad has lower wear than UHMWP given 5 Mrad. Curiously, highly cross-linked polyethylenes gain weight during hip simulator testing. We postulated that (a) UHMWP irradiated to 9.5 Mrad would wear less than UHMWP irradiated to 5 Mrad UHMWP, (b) articulation against 38-mm heads would accentuate this difference, and (c) weight gain of highly cross-linked material reflects the inadequacy of load soak controls. We compared 9.5 versus 5 Mrad polyethylene in hip simulator wear tests, with both load soak corrections and with novel "motion soak" corrections. The 9.5-Mrad material wore less than 5-Mrad material for 32- and 38-mm heads. Motion soak corrections were more accurate than load soak corrections.
Medical subject headings
- Hip Prosthesis
- Prosthesis Design
- Prosthesis Failure
Anatomy
- hip
- femur