Metabolic equivalents during the 10-m shuttle walking test for post-myocardial infarction patients.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17601768.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Comorbidities are found to affect metabolic equivalents (METs). Therefore the main objective of this study was to compare METs (1 MET: oxygen uptake (Vo(2)) 3.5 ml/kg/min) during an incremental shuttle walking test (SWT) between non-cardiac and post-myocardial infarction (MI) men, and secondly to determine any differences in Vo(2) (ml/kg/min) between flat treadmill walking and the turning during the shuttle walking in non-cardiac subjects. Comparative study. Thirty one post-MI (mean (SD) age 63.5 (6.5), range 53-77 years) from phase IV cardiac rehabilitation and 19 non-cardiac (64.6 (7.5), range 51-76 years) men participated. All subjects performed an SWT, and non-cardiac subjects a treadmill test of similar protocol. Throughout both, the subject's Vo(2) was measured. Analysis comparing lines of regression showed METs at 1.12 to 4.16 mph were higher (p<0.001) for post-MIs versus non-cardiac subjects. For non-cardiac subjects, there were no differences between the treadmill test and SWT (p>0.9) and LoA showed acceptable agreement in METs between treadmill vs SWT, mean difference -1.1 (8.8) (1.96SD). It would appear that for asymptomatic individuals it is appropriate to apply established METs for flat walking to the SWT. However, the significantly higher METs for the post-MI compared with the non-cardiac subjects indicates the need for caution when using METs derived from healthy subjects in the prescription of exercise for myocardial patients.
Medical subject headings
- Energy Metabolism
- Myocardial Infarction
- Oxygen Consumption
- Walking