"Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1763685.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The "conservative" microsurgical lumbar discectomy described by Williams for the treatment of herniated lumbar disc is compared in a retrospective study with the standard microsurgical technique of Caspar and Loew. In order to enable such a retrospective comparison, a special randomization had to be chosen. The data concerning outcome are based on a questionnaire, in which the patient can describe his actual health situation. The result in the group of 56 patients operated on by the Williams technique with a mean follow-up of 27 months is excellent or good in 89% vs. 74% in the standard technique group. Reoperations due to a recurrence were identical in both groups (3.6% and 3.9%).
Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral Disc Displacement
- Lumbar Vertebrae
- Microsurgery