Necessity of cycloplegia for assessing refractive error in 12-year-old children: a population-based study.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17659966.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare pre- and postcycloplegic autorefraction in two separate age samples of Australian school children. Population-based cross-sectional study of random cluster samples. Autorefraction was performed before and after cycloplegia, using 1% cyclopentolate, in the right eyes of 2,233 12-year-old and 210 6-year-old children. The mean spherical equivalent (SEQ) difference between these measures was 0.84 diopters (D) (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 0.87 D), more hyperopic in post- than precycloplegic autorefractive assessments in the 12-year-old children and 1.18 D (95% CI 1.05 to 1.30 D) more hyperopic in the 6-year-old children. Precycloplegic autorefraction substantially overestimated the proportion of children with myopia, misclassifying 17.8% aged 12 years and 9.5% aged 6 years. Conversely, precycloplegic autorefraction did not detect moderate to high hyperopia in 2.28% of 12-year-olds and 17.14% of 6-year-olds. Our findings reinforce the importance of using cycloplegic autorefraction in children up to age 12 years.
Medical subject headings
- Cyclopentolate
- Mydriatics
- Population Surveillance
- Pupil
- Refraction, Ocular
- Refractive Errors